8 ms·

This is brilliant. Apple could also cut out the “hey” part to make it more natural. “hey Siri... Siri”

• thisacctforreal 9y ago
  That seemingly simple repeat functionality would require a much less simple nn, from what I understand. That would trade off both security and privacy for very limited gain.
• crooked-v 9y ago
  "Hey Siri" has always seemed like such an awkward phrase to me. "Alexa" flows so much better, besides the general awkwardness if someone in the room has that name.
  • mikehines 9y ago
    Alexa is actually a difficult word to pronounce for non-English speakers.
    • alexsb92 9y ago
      Really? Are these non-European languages that you're referring to, because many of the European languages have their own versions of the name Alexander for both men and women, so I'd imagine Alexa wouldn't cause too many issues.
      • throwanem 9y ago
        The 'x' in 'Alexander' is (typically) voiced, where that in 'Alexa' is not. I can see that making a substantial difference for speakers of languages where those phonemes are differently composed.
        • arghwhat 9y ago
          What do you mean by voiced? I put the stress differently, but otherwise I would pronounce Alexa as Alexander cut short. I can imagine the vowels being pronounced differently in various accents, but I can't imagine an accent where the 'x' in those two names are different.
          • dragonwriter 9y ago
            > I put the stress differently, but otherwise I would pronounce Alexa as Alexander cut short. In “Alexander”, the normal pronunciation of the letter “x” is the voiced consonant cluster /gz/, in “Alexa”, it's usually the unvoiced cluster /ks/. (Also, the second “a” is usually different between the two, being /æ/, like the “a” in “pad”, in “Alexander” and /ɑ:/, like the “a” in “father”, in “Alexa”.) The difference in the “x” is the normal way that the pronunciation of “x” differs when following a stressed vs. unstressed vowel in English.
          • throwanem 9y ago
            "Voiced" in the phonetic sense [1], i.e., spoken with the vocal cords vibrating. Voiced 'x' sounds like the /gz/ in "eggs", /ɛgz/; voiceless 'x' sounds like the /ks/ in the American English pronunciation of 'x' itself, /ɛks/. Many, if not all, American English dialects pronounce the words in the fashion I describe. In them, the name 'Alexander' would be /ˌæ.lɛˈ(gz)æn.dər/ while 'Alexa' would be /əˈlɛ.(ks)ə/ - in both of which, the phoneme corresponding to the letter 'x' is parenthesized. Generally in English 'x' is voiced when it precedes a stressed vowel, which it does in 'Alexander'; in 'Alexa', 'x' precedes a reduced vowel, and therefore would always take the unvoiced pronunciation. (It'd sound very odd to an anglophone ear otherwise - say /əˈlɛ.gzə/ one time out loud and see if you don't feel the same.) That said, it wouldn't be incorrect to pronounce 'Alexander' in American English with an unvoiced 'x', as /ˌæ.lɛˈksæn.dər/ but, while I believe some dialects of English may default to this pronunciation, certainly not all do. (Neither of the dialects I speak does so, at the very least.) This pronunciation also produces a "hitch" or break in the word between the unvoiced 'x' and its preceding vowel, which would tend to make it a little odd both to hear and to say. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_(phonetics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_(phonetics)
      • drak0n1c 9y ago
        Particularly difficult for Chinese speakers. I've heard Alessa a lot.
    • GFischer 9y ago
      Works fine in Spanish, but I can imagine other languages having trouble. I'm actually pretty impressed by Alexa's voice recognition so far.
  • mort96 9y ago
    Alexa definitely flows a bit better than Hey Siri, but being Norwegian, I find the phrase "ok google" to be almost comical. My mouth just can't make the sounds quick enough for it to not sound ridiculous. Hey Siri and Alexa both flow comparably very well.
    • gmemstr 9y ago
      I 100% agree, as a native English speaker (western Canada). "Hey Google" has a much nicer flow, although I say "Google" too much on a daily basis for me to want that to be a trigger (practically speaking).
  • pkamb 9y ago
    "echo" is even better. So weird to me that they call the device "echo", already a pretty strong brand name, but then insist on the "alexa" naming of the assistant.
    • kfriede 9y ago
      I'd imagine it's to give the product/voice a more human-like feel to it. "Echo" sounds like I'm talking to a robot, or a dog (or a robot dog). "Alexa" could be a human.