> concerns of less population-dense areas are ignored As I said, areas don't vote. People do. Why should ten people living on a hundred acres get more represen

> concerns of less population-dense areas are ignored As I said, areas don't vote. People do. Why should ten people living on a hundred acres get more representation than ten people living on one? Painting "one person one vote" as colonialist is flat-out dishonest. It's the alternative that's discriminatory, treating some people as more deserving than others because they own more land.