3 ms·
I like the fact that this exists, but I prefer to use jq. I also would like to know in which situation this is preferable to jq.
by fiatjaf 9y ago
I like the fact that this exists, but I prefer to use jq.
I also would like to know in which situation this is preferable to jq.
- astral303 9y agoThere's also http://jmespath.org http://jmespath.org -- the syntax for which is supported in AWS CLIs. Not sure which one is better at this point. Using jq still often feels like trying to decode a code golf contest entry.
- fiatjaf 9y agoReally? I find jq syntax rather pleasant to read and write.
- mtrn 9y agoThe jq tool is great. Start using it today as a JSON pretty printer and learn it's more powerful features (selection, object creation) as you need them. The only thing I would like to add to jq would be the ability to use multiple cores.