The irony is that they are acting exactly like a utility is supposed to, offering their services to anyone, regardless of their politics. > “It’s a tricky issu

The irony is that they are acting exactly like a utility is supposed to, offering their services to anyone, regardless of their politics. > “It’s a tricky issue,” [Wendy Moe, professor of marketing at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business] says, because once the companies decide they’ll do hands-on work for political groups, “it’s hard for them to say we’ll help these groups, but not others.”" The water utility can't legally refuse service to the Trump campaign, and neither would the Facebook utility. What you're asking for, is for Facebook to act in way they're specifically only able to act because they're not regulated like a utility. Or for a quick lesson is public choice theory, consider exactly who would be writing the regulations a regulated Facebook would be regulated under and ponder whether that's going to end well.