3 ms·
The early Atoms weren't P3 based, they were an original low-power design and actually quite a bit slower than the P3 at similar clockspeeds. Though a lot of the
by opencl 9y ago
The early Atoms weren't P3 based, they were an original low-power design and actually quite a bit slower than the P3 at similar clockspeeds. Though a lot of the unpleasantness of using those machines was more from the extremely anemic GPU which has also improved considerably since then.
Here's a benchmark comparison between the Atom used in the EeePC 901 (N270 @ 1.6Ghz), the GPD Pocket (x7-Z8750 @ 1.6Ghz), and a 1.1Ghz P3: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2968&cmp[]=1381&cmp[]=614 https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2968&cmp[]=13...
The P3 is slightly faster than the old Atom in spite of the lower clock, and the new one is over 2x as fast single threaded and over 7x as fast multithreaded.
- haikuginger 9y ago> Though a lot of the unpleasantness of using those machines was more from the extremely anemic GPU which has also improved considerably since then. Specifically, the GMA950 that didn't have hardware video decode for H.264, which was already the mainstream choice for any Internet video. Combined with the anemic in-order Bonnell core, it was dead on arrival for most uses involving any sort of video. Some netbooks even came with a separate Broadcom PCIe card whose only purpose was hardware video decode.
- morganvachon 9y agoActually they trace their lineage directly to the PIII. The original Atom was based on the Stealey line, which in turn was based on Pentium M, which in turn was based on the PIII design. Later Atom revisions left that legacy behind and became their own distinct process.