3 ms·
>> Either way it means your value to society is gone. Your value to society is much more than that. You have value for friends, relatives. You also bring some
by wiz21c 9y ago
>> Either way it means your value to society is gone.
Your value to society is much more than that. You have value for friends, relatives. You also bring some idea that may be used by others. You may fix or build things that will be of value to someone else. Etc. This is very important.
The other argument is that if you reduce yourself to work, then you'll give credits to the argument that work is everything and that, for example, unemployment is to be ashamed of.
- speleding 9y agoI agree that "Value to society" != "Value to the economy". But the value to the economy is what determines your wages in large part.
- wiz21c 9y agoYep, my answer was specifically against what you say : >>> what determines your wages in large part. The wages should not be that important anymore. That would prevent capital from being predatory. How we achieve that, I dunno, universal income ? maybe... maybe not. But IMHO, if we continue to think wages == beginning of everything, it certainly won't change.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- humanrebar 9y ago> Your value to society is much more than that. That may be true, but it's more of a statement of faith than an objective truth. Since all the things you bring up are performance-based (socially successful, successful inventor, etc.), it's also a bit of a sideways move from "how important is your job". It also leaves open the possibility that people can be net negatives to society, so it doesn't really help individuals feel actualized.