3 ms·
It seems that running a free CA doesn't really have a business model, so capitalism isn't going to produce viable competitors. Additionally, other impact-focus
by diafygi 9y ago
It seems that running a free CA doesn't really have a business model, so capitalism isn't going to produce viable competitors.
Additionally, other impact-focused people (non-profits, etc.), who would otherwise be willing to make a free CA, probably think Let's Encrypt is doing good enough, so why waste valuable time making the same thing when you could focus on having an impact elsewhere?
I suspect this is a pretty common end result in public-good tasks that don't have business models. They naturally grow to be too big to fail. Some governments try to solve this by just absorbing the task and making it a part of the government's responsibilities. I doubt this would happen for Let's Encrypt, so I guess we'll be stuck with a too-big-to-fail non-profit until it fails, starts to suck too much, gets absorbed by the government, or someone figures out a business model.
- Touche 9y agoI would think (hope) that big ad companies like Google and Facebook would find that the proliferation of https is good for business and provide a free CA
- ensignavenger 9y agoBut can't the Acme protocol be used by paid cert providers, too? Are there any paid providers adopting it?
- diafygi 9y agoYes, it can. However, the running-a-free-CA part is what is too big to fail, not the protocol.