5 ms·
"The main difference between MailChimp and SES, is the fact that SES lacks many of the features from MailChimp." That's for sure. SES only has 1 feature in com
by pbreit 9y ago
"The main difference between MailChimp and SES, is the fact that SES lacks many of the features from MailChimp."
That's for sure. SES only has 1 feature in common with Mailchimp and that is the sending of an email. Mailchimp's primary function is managing distribution lists, email templates and receiver activity analytics.
- dreamache 9y agoAuthor here.. yeah, that's why you have to use SES with Mailwizz, which gives you all of those features from MC. So, a more accurate title would have been, MailChimp vs. SES + Mailwizz. ;)
- JacobJans 9y agoI use Mailwizz, and NO it does not replicate the missing featues of Mailchimp. It may be cheap –– but you get what you pay for. It's value really depends on your needs. It is in no way comprehensive.
- cardine 9y agoIf Mailwizz had A/B split testing I'd consider giving it a further look. But it looks like it doesn't, and it is worth paying $240/mo (or whatever my MailChimp bill is) just for that functionality.
- nothing-special 9y agoSES vs Mandrill I believe would have been a better comparison here.
- styfle 9y agoThis would have been try a couple years ago, but every Mandrill user has a MailChimp account since the merger.