2 ms·
It seems more like a structural flaw in how the law is written. Arguably if a case makes it to the SC then it means the law was ambiguous to start with. For som
by peoplewindow 9y ago
It seems more like a structural flaw in how the law is written. Arguably if a case makes it to the SC then it means the law was ambiguous to start with. For something like boundary allocations an algorithm could have been written into the law directly by lawmakers. Why does this even end up in front of the Supremes?
- vannevar 9y agoSwitching to a fair districting algorithm will never benefit the party in power, since by definition the existing law put them there. The only change they're going to want to make is in the direction of further bias.
- peoplewindow 9y agoThe UK is successfully going through a re-districting process at the moment. So I don't think it's impossible.