Indeed, no proof, as almost always the case with hacking. Just probabilities. Moreover, intelligence agencies that routinely use misdirection to point the blame

Indeed, no proof, as almost always the case with hacking. Just probabilities. Moreover, intelligence agencies that routinely use misdirection to point the blame at each other. Who knows what happened. Could have been hacked by multiple attackers too given how simple it was. Regardless, I think the next sentence is the most telling: Or, as CDT's Hall puts it, "If John Podesta had been able to turn this on sometime last year, the world might be a very different place." Implying what - that Trump wouldn't have won? The leaked emails were real though. What he's saying is that if the USA had known less about Clinton, they might have picked her to be prez. That doesn't seem very likely given the very long track record Clinton had and the high level of familiarity Americans had with her, but even if true - "this feature is good because it would have kept Americans in the dark" does not seem like a positive message to send.