3 ms·

I agree on the naming convention, Microsoft is once again defending its title as the limbo champion of naming things. I'm inclined to defend Microsoft's strate

I agree on the naming convention, Microsoft is once again defending its title as the limbo champion of naming things. I'm inclined to defend Microsoft's strategy for forced security updates, they're really doing a commendable job of proactively defending their users from newly discovered threats. Feature updates not so much.

jakebasile 9y ago
My response is they can do a great job by offering security patches quickly and separately, but it should remain the user's decision to install it or not. Sure, hide it away so the less technically inclined don't flip the switch and remain vulnerable. I just want to control my computer again and I dislike being talked down to by Microsoft. Even Apple, known for a "We Know Best™" attitude towards users, allows users to decide if and when to update. The vast majority of users update almost immediately.