4 ms·
They did say in the original article that the pattern was incorrect, and likely to have been a third party copy of a design originating in some Muslim area. Tha
by Brakenshire 9y ago
They did say in the original article that the pattern was incorrect, and likely to have been a third party copy of a design originating in some Muslim area. That's disproven by the dating research presented here, but it wasn't unreasonable.