> For one thing, wasm bytecode can be decoded much faster than JavaScript can be parsed True, but as long as you have space for cache, it only goes faster once

> For one thing, wasm bytecode can be decoded much faster than JavaScript can be parsed True, but as long as you have space for cache, it only goes faster once. Wasm is also loaded by JS itself and of limited usage right. I think the first comment is actually accurate about the state of wasm. It only brings value to people compiling from C/C++ to the web. It is not a technology of the future, but a retrofit for the past.