Yes, it looks good. Had a look at the license you've added, it's still to ambiguous to use commercially. For instance, it says "Do not distribute on your hosti

Yes, it looks good. Had a look at the license you've added, it's still to ambiguous to use commercially. For instance, it says "Do not distribute on your hosting/third-party service.". While I assume that means as a whole stand-alone kit, it technically covers use in websites (as parts of the code will be distributed to browsers as part of the design). This is why its important to use an established license, either an open source one like MIT or a proper commercial license. Without one or the other many companies (who are the ones with the deep pockets to pay for support) won't touch it.