2 ms·
“certain types of offensive speech” is clarified as "the government should be able to prevent people from saying offensive statements about minority groups" whe
by flycaliguy 9y ago
“certain types of offensive speech” is clarified as "the government should be able to prevent people from saying offensive statements about minority groups" when you look at the study.
I agree that it feels inflated compared to potentially less emotionally provocative question about freedom of speech as a fundamental concept.
Then again, I wouldn't be shocked if that is the the general stance of a lot of people. Speaking as a Canadian, these types of government restrictions on hateful speech are written into law and largely uncontested in politics.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/20/40-of-millennials-ok-with-limiting-speech-offensive-to-minorities/ft_15-11-19_speech/ http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/20/40-of-millen...
- ithilglin909 9y agoLargely not successfully contested, perhaps, but not uncontested. I’m probably more tuned into the Canadian zeitgeist than your average American (I’m basically half Canadian and have a large number of Canadian family and acquaintances, including some involved in Canadian politics), and I certainly hear concern about where the ideas behind those laws may lead. I really don’t understand people who are more afraid of a racial slur (to be clear, I strongly disapprove of that kind of thing) than of losing freedom of thought and of expression.