> inflammatory, unsubstantiated nonsense doesn't belong here I have to be direct to say that your post is a perfect example of this statement. The OP certainly

> inflammatory, unsubstantiated nonsense doesn't belong here I have to be direct to say that your post is a perfect example of this statement. The OP certainly points out an issue and is substantiated with a reasoning that long term change cannot be observed by individual in much smaller time scale, which is totally reasonable and a preferred way of thinking. Because insufficient methodology produces inaccurate observation, in turn flawed process to address the issues. Just labeling OP as “inflammatory and unsubstituted nonsense” basically is 1) distorting the fact 2) trying to impose false claim on reasonable ideas, and 3) shuting down non-uniform ideas. This, in reality, does not belong here, or I believe based on my understanding.