>We must show that the accused, not the accuser, will suffer when a case goes public, and do so by building institutions of support for victims who come forward

>We must show that the accused, not the accuser, will suffer when a case goes public, and do so by building institutions of support for victims who come forward. Shouldn't it be "that the one proven guilty will suffer"? With effective assumption of innocence for accused and accuser. (No "someone said x did y so x must be guilty" and no "nah, z is just claiming that for attention" without proof)