> I immediately switched to skeptic mode when I saw no actuation points or normalization for travel distance. All this is showing is that to move further it tak

> I immediately switched to skeptic mode when I saw no actuation points or normalization for travel distance. All this is showing is that to move further it takes longer. I thought his explanation (that delay from the start of the motion) was a good one. Unless someone is starting with a key partially depressed/near the actuation point (which you certainly could do), the key travel time is going to be a part of the perceived delay. Seems fair to me, given that delay and perception are the point of the post. Now, if you think that gamers are starting with partially-depressed keys and therefore will actually experience less of a keystroke delay, that would be a valid counterargument. > Every step of the process has huge flaws and he doesn't even use a reasonable set of devices. I don't think this is being portrayed as an especially accurate study; the author includes plenty of caveats.