4 ms·
Even if DTX is built it is still primarily a bus station. By design it was a bus station first, with the afterthought of also catering to trains (and badly at t
by erentz 9y ago
Even if DTX is built it is still primarily a bus station. By design it was a bus station first, with the afterthought of also catering to trains (and badly at that, with passenger circulation issues and too few platforms).
The mere idea of having a transbay bus station is flawed. Passengers should transfer from there busses to BART and cross the bay on BART. And if you say “well BART is crowded and has problems”. Yes it is and those should be fixed and a second teansbay tube should’ve been built instead of a $3billion (?) bus station.
- sbuccini 9y agoWhat about those coming from Marin on GGT or those coming from the Oakland hills, where it's easier to get on Hwy 24 than it is to drive through residential traffic to a BART station?
- pmiller2 9y agoMarin blocked BART from coming through in the 60's, so it's their own damn fault.
- mjg59 9y agoThis is a grossly oversimplified version of the story. The Golden Gate bridge authority asserted that the additional weight of BART on a lower deck would reduce the clearance underneath the bridge sufficiently that naval vessels wouldn't be able to pass. The study supporting this was paid for by the bridge authority, who had a financial incentive to prevent BART from going ahead - nevertheless, there was a risk that Marin might never have got BART even if the population had voted for it, and would still have been on the hook for payments. This depressed support in Marin sufficiently that it might have dragged the regional vote below the 60% threshold required for the entire system to be built, and the other counties pressured Marin to drop out against their will. If San Mateo hadn't chosen to drop out earlier, there's a decent chance that Marin would have service today.
- jdblair 9y agoThere lots of places in the East Bay where taking a bus is the fastest public transit. There are Transbay Bus stops in places, like Montclair, that are far from BART stations.
- jakelarkin 9y agocounterpoint: buses have greater reach and are potentially cheaper to add and operate than BART trains on the margin. If the primary transbay tube goes down in a quake we'll benefit from the diversification.
- jwilliams 9y agobuses have greater reach and are potentially cheaper I know you're counterpointing here, but really it nets out the same. Connecting transport increases it's potential. It baffles me that SF chooses not to integrate Bus, BART and Caltrain.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> It baffles me that SF chooses not to integrate Bus, BART and Caltrain. SF does not choose that. In fact SF has long chosen to integrate bus, Muni rail, and BART, and more recently also Caltrain, though getting the Caltrain part done has been hampered by a number of problems, including the cost overruns of Transbay Transit Center’s first phase, which have eaten up the money for the second phase.
- pmiller2 9y agoHow can you even say that with a straight face? None of {Muni bus, Muni rail, BART, Cal Train, AC Transit} coordinate transfers with each other. Unless you have that, you can't say the systems are "integrated" by any means. Edit: by "don't coordinate," I mean there are no timed transfers between systems.
- jwilliams 9y agoSuspect we have a different experience -- and pretty different expectations in terms to integration.