3 ms·
The Supreme Court of Canada disagrees with your.. opinion https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/quebec-woman-who-caused-fatal-crash-after-stopping-to-
by btbuildem 9y ago
The Supreme Court of Canada disagrees with your.. opinion
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/quebec-woman-who-caused-fatal-crash-after-stopping-to-help-ducks-loses-appeal/article35255208/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com& https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/quebec-woman-...
She was sentenced in December 2014 to 90 days in jail to be served on weekends, three years' probation and 240 hours of community service, and given a 10-year driving ban.
- saosebastiao 9y agoThat's not the Supreme Court of Canada...that's the Quebec Appeals Court. Regardless, it was dumb of her to stop there. But nowhere near as dumb as your idea that crosswalks are marked by definition. If you're going to give driving advice, don't be wrong. Especially on something like that, where you could easily kill someone and where the penalty could be as severe as manslaughter.