5 ms·
This talk makes perfect sense if you know a bit about Steele's recent research history. It was a main focus of Fortress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress
by festidious 9y ago
This talk makes perfect sense if you know a bit about Steele's recent research history.
It was a main focus of Fortress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress_(programming_language...), for example, which was interesting but never quite got off the ground in the same way as other competitors, in part because of the focus on notation implementation.
If anything, my experience following Fortress led me to believe what Steele was discussing in his talk is both a tremendous opportunity but also much more difficult than the impression he creates.
For what it's worth, I thought the talk was really interesting and I would like to see it taken more seriously, if not as an immediate goal, then a long-term one.
- samth 9y agoWhile we spent a lot of time on it, I don't think the failures of Fortress were about the time spent on notation. (Source: I wrote the first parser for Fortress, as well as the first type checker and interpreter.)