3 ms·
Is it? It's also possible that FB, finding itself the victim of continual PSYOPs, is hiring people with backgrounds in that to help defend the company or needs
by SomeStupidPoint 9y ago
Is it?
It's also possible that FB, finding itself the victim of continual PSYOPs, is hiring people with backgrounds in that to help defend the company or needs security cleared people to liase with government security teams on that issue.
I'm getting sick of the cheap cynicism that fancies simplistic, dramatic interpretations over nuanced, realistic ones.
(This isn't to say that FB doesnt collaborate with the government in any number of ways -- just that the parent is a lazy, cheap shot.)
- misterHN 9y agoIf FB is a victim of continual PSYOPs, then how do I sign up to launch more psychological attacks on FB and Zuck? I want the stupid jew crying like a baby hours every day. I want him to spend so much time crying that he is embarrassed to talk about it. I want Zuck brain damaged, I want him afraid of the world, I want him afraid of people, I want him afraid of his family, I want him afraid of his staff, I want him afraid of his investors, I want him afraid of the SEC, I want him afraid of the NYSE...
- grp 9y agoFrom the article: These types of employees are needed when private companies interact and share information back and forth with government agencies.
- bdcravens 9y agoYes, and this can be as simple as a contractor building a CRUD intranet app for buying post-its for a 3-letter organization.
- SomeStupidPoint 9y agoHow does your comment relate to my point? It does nothing to help us decide between the two cases -- they could be selling data to the CIA or sharing cyberdefense strategies, both would require employees with clearance.