> DBAs must know how replication works, as RDBMSs are not toys. It's naive to think that replication in other RDBMs itjustworks! - see, for example, the replica

> DBAs must know how replication works, as RDBMSs are not toys. It's naive to think that replication in other RDBMs itjustworks! - see, for example, the replication bug that caused slave corruption to the famous transportation company. I assume you mean Uber, and the replication bug they ran into on 9.2. Isn't it a bit strange comparing a bug (that got fixed promptly after it was reported) to implementing inherently unsafe replication mode?