> if you actually read it. Perhaps you're just repeating what the commentariat told you he said? No, I did read his memo when it was first released publicly.

> if you actually read it. Perhaps you're just repeating what the commentariat told you he said? No, I did read his memo when it was first released publicly. If I were him I'd be embarrassed to have published such a paper (rather than deluding himself into having been "fired for truth", as he put it). A summary of the memo: intellectually weak arguments blaming anti-women bias on female biology, with dull side rants about leftists and communism.