You can talk about the reasoning without attacking me; it's not hard. I never said anything about you (other than you are attacking me); I have no idea what you

You can talk about the reasoning without attacking me; it's not hard. I never said anything about you (other than you are attacking me); I have no idea what your intent or thinking is, what kind of person you are or what you support. Maybe you are the grand wizard[0] of the KKK of SV; maybe you are a civil rights organizer but are playing devil's advocate; maybe you are an unwitting 'useful idiot'[1] for the white male supremacists; maybe you are a PhD in philosophy and just like to debate; maybe you are 13 years old and are just trying on some ideas for size; maybe you are a troll; maybe you are in the office down the hall; and probably you are something I haven't thought of and with more complex motivations than these simple characterizations. All I can comment on are the words on the page and that's all anyone should be commenting on. The words fit the narrative I described. [0] Cool title; don't you think? Another attempt to normalize evil: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/james-damore-says-the-quiet-part-loud-what-the-free-speech-activist-movement-is-all-about/ http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/james-damore-says-the-qui... [1] not a pejorative, but a term of art