3 ms·
> I came across it because at one point, there was a vogue for using these lenses with an adaptor on Micro 4/3 cameras. The idea was that you'd just dropped get
by tesseract 9y ago
> I came across it because at one point, there was a vogue for using these lenses with an adaptor on Micro 4/3 cameras. The idea was that you'd just dropped getting on for a thousand pounds on a camera body, so couldn't afford a lens, so you'd buy some thirty quid lens from China and use that. Needless to say, it didn't take people long to realise that was really stupid.
I think people were also attracted to adapting those lenses because there are readily available CCTV and machine-vision lenses which are, compared to typical photographic lenses, extremely fast (like f/1.0 and lower). This is for applications like security cameras which need to be able to work in dim lighting conditions, or machine vision applications that require a very short shutter speed. Of course what the Micro 4/3 crowd eventually came to realize is that in order to achieve a fast lens at a modest price point, those lenses trade off other qualities like resolution and distortion, which are less important in their intended applications, but seriously compromise the lens for photography.
- mrob 9y agoI'd like to see lenses with the opposite trade-off: slow (ie. diffraction limited) but excellent optical properties. They'd be ideal for outdoor and long exposure deep focus shots, and it should be possible to make them smaller and lighter than normal lenses. But these lenses seem not to exist despite their potential utility. People focus on low f-number just because it's easy to measure, and assume everybody wants blurred backgrounds. Is there any source for high quality slow lenses?