>Agile itself was very simple and limited as a manifesto, arguably trivial and obvious. It's mostly just vague. Moreover, "Individuals and interactions over pr

>Agile itself was very simple and limited as a manifesto, arguably trivial and obvious. It's mostly just vague. Moreover, "Individuals and interactions over processes and tools" is, IMHO, wrong, and has been used to justify de-prioritizing tooling improvements on the teams I've worked on (e.g. automated testing, BDD). The interpretation was, I think, defensible, but the outcome wasn't. Human interaction is nice but it doesn't scale. I think a large part of Agile's popularity is due to its vagueness. A bit like religion, people just assign their own meaning to it.