3 ms·
One is wrong: either the table, or our "opinions" about genetics. The table is freely quoted from a well-known research done in my country during the 70's. Howe
by avip 9y ago
One is wrong: either the table, or our "opinions" about genetics. The table is freely quoted from a well-known research done in my country during the 70's. However, I cannot find a reasonable reference to the original research, which should settle things. All I could find are citations of it in non-academic context. I'll try to contact the author and get my hands on the actual paper.
Even if I can't cite that specific table... it's extremely easy to find other examples just by digging into dominance hierarchy examples. And there are 3 loci in the table, not 2.
- gus_massa 9y agoI'd like to see a reference. I used only two to simplify. Let's try to see how your table looks after you kill all the purple/purplish nasty mutants! Anemone colours table D => Dominant R => Recesive * => does not matter | Red | White | Result | | RR | * | RED | | D* | RR | WHITE | In the second row, if Red is dominant and White is recessive, why the result is white? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_(genetics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_(genetics) My first example is essentially equivalent to the AB0 group system. (White is 0, Red is A, Purple is B, Pinkish is AB.) A and B are dominant the lack of A and B is recessive. The AB0 is slightly more complicated, and mix some parts of my second example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABO_blood_group_system#Genetics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABO_blood_group_system#Genetic...