> A smart-city architecture allows “better” information-sharing, strong identity management, better blanket surveillance as well as targeted surveillance, it be

> A smart-city architecture allows “better” information-sharing, strong identity management, better blanket surveillance as well as targeted surveillance, it benefits law-enforcement with better access to location tracking. > In conclusion, one doesn’t have to wear a tinfoil hat to understand that these solutions will swing both ways. And some are going to get hurt. To all those who think smart-cities will liberate humanity from repressive regimes, please think again. For a deeper perspective on this point, I'd highly recommend reading "The Net Delusion" by Evgeny Morozov [1]. He focuses on the moral/ethical/political/sociological aspects of modern technological change and systems that other optimistic authors intentionally fail to cover. > Smart cities implemented over complex self serving bureaucratic processes can become an electronic manifestation of stupidity written in code. This sentence immediately reminded me of Kafka's "The Castle." The future could be either empowering or oppressive, or both to some degree, depending largely on how we legislatively control the technological systems we're building. [1] https://www.amazon.com/Net-Delusion-Dark-Internet-Freedom/dp/1610391063 https://www.amazon.com/Net-Delusion-Dark-Internet-Freedom/dp...