I agree with you. This article mentions Java and C++ as languages that have become too complex, but without actually stating what this complexity is. Maybe it

I agree with you. This article mentions Java and C++ as languages that have become too complex, but without actually stating what this complexity is. Maybe it's just the summary-like nature of the article, but it talks as if we're all meant to just agree with it. I do agree on the merits of Go (especially relating multi-core processors), but there's surely a better way of expressing these merits than bagging out Java & C++. Just seems a little tacky to me. (Sorry for the tone of my comment.)