I don't know, the way successful large organizations do things? A small number of intelligent board of directors elect people who have large leeway. Shareholder

I don't know, the way successful large organizations do things? A small number of intelligent board of directors elect people who have large leeway. Shareholders can vote, but mostly on few items or for no confidence. You'd never let shareholders vote on certain things. So compared to that model. But I'm sure you could devise something even better if you sat down and thought about it for ten minutes. (What was the founding fathers idea? Only letting taxpayers or people with more than 100 acres vote? Not suggesting these, just pointing out that you have trivially many options compared to the current model)