3 ms·
>> It's not literally true that interference is a myth. And there are fundamental physical limitations that we'll eventually bump up against. But those fundamen
by throwaway613834 9y ago
>> It's not literally true that interference is a myth. And there are fundamental physical limitations that we'll eventually bump up against. But those fundamental limits are beyond the horizon. In the context of historic and contemporary spectrum policy, interference is indeed a myth.
> Technology may help, and the technological effects mentioned in the articles do happen but there is a fundamental limit
Parent mentioned exactly that in their comment.
- raverbashing 9y ago> But those fundamental limits are beyond the horizon. And that is the part I disagree Especially when you have a large amount of people in the same place (stadium, busy street, etc) Or even your office wifi
- user5994461 9y agoParent is wrong. There is a fundamental limit and we are at it in many scenarios and we've been for a very long time.
- grandalf 9y agoJust curious how one would define that limit. Would it be correct to define it as: Bits of data delivered at or above minimum tolerable latency per hz of RF bandwidth per second?