3 ms·
The first review by the same author was amazing but since then things have fallen off a bit. Was the privacy aspect even tested? The only line I could find was
by thisisit 9y ago
The first review by the same author was amazing but since then things have fallen off a bit.
Was the privacy aspect even tested? The only line I could find was - " I haven’t read much about instant/private send". So was the PrivateSend feature even tested?
Additionally, what does this imply?
"Masternodes are used for instant/private transactions and governance"
Does it mean only masternodes can use the privacy focused feature?
An additional note, can someone please explain me what is so novel about the governance policy other than instead of asking votes from the entire network (ie bitcoin), the votes are focused only in hands of people with enough coin?
- lawn 9y ago> Does it mean only masternodes can use the privacy focused feature? No, it means the masternodes provide privacy by mixing your coins. This has privacy implications. > An additional note, can someone please explain me what is so novel about the governance policy other than instead of asking votes from the entire network (ie bitcoin), the votes are focused only in hands of people with enough coin? That's the novelty. No it's not particularly useful.
- aminorex 9y agoIndeed, and the privacy implications of centralized mixers are doubleplus ungood.
- abrkn 9y agoThanks for the feedback. I have to admit I don't think this review went well at all. I tried to cover too many areas and ended up feeling like I covered none.