4 ms·
You're right of course. So if it was done in say multiples of 15msec. The first window for a response is at 15msec. The second window at 30msec. The third w
by jac_no_k 16y ago
You're right of course. So if it was done in say multiples of 15msec. The first window for a response is at 15msec. The second window at 30msec. The third window at 45msec and so on.
And I agree it's difficult to keep the balance between an acceptable user experience and keeping the crackers at bay.
- fragmede 16y ago>You're right of course. So if it was done in say multiples of 15msec. The first window for a response is at 15msec. The second window at 30msec. The third window at 45msec and so on. Instead of the comparison that checks the whole field, start two threads, one per real cpu core, and run the unknown comparison against an a known good, and in parallel, and only return when both have completed. Not the most efficient, but would scale properly for faster and slower cpus.