3 ms·
There is another problem with stack ranking -- I saw this at a previous employer: some people are hired into "4s and 5s" from the onset. I heard some hiring m
by TuringNYC 9y ago
There is another problem with stack ranking -- I saw this at a previous employer: some people are hired into "4s and 5s" from the onset. I heard some hiring managers upset that they would have to force rank their hand-selected elite team into 1-5 ranks, and upset at the situation, they purposefully hired weak workers with the intention of slotting them into 4 and 5 ranks. Their argument was (i dont agree):
- these weak workers wouldnt otherwise have a job
- these weak workers get an extra year of employment they "dont deserve"
- the strong team members get the 1,2,3 ranks they deserve
- the hiring manager is "forced" to do this
All that said, seems incredibly unfair to hire people directly into the chopping block without the expectation set from the start.
- sjg007 9y agoIt’s an oxymoron.. ‘we only hire the best and stack rank the rest’.
- kurusii 9y agoWow, that sounds awful. It's a losing situation all around, between the company not getting what it intended (firing the pre-existing dead weight, and getting rid of scapegoats) and, of course, the employees who are duped into joining just to be fired later. Which companies do this?