I agree it's good to point that out and add your examples to the discussion. But the article struck me as fair: -It's first and foremost a profile piece of a m

I agree it's good to point that out and add your examples to the discussion. But the article struck me as fair: -It's first and foremost a profile piece of a man who is definitively right-wing and has major ties to right-wing donors and interests. -It had a wary narrative on Pauling as well, who is clearly indicated as left-wing. -It offers warnings about alt-science in general in the closing paragraphs.