3 ms·
Well, actually it DOES make them less impressive... because once you look, actually look objectively, at how x86 continues to close the gap, you realize that th
by patrickgzill 16y ago
Well, actually it DOES make them less impressive... because once you look, actually look objectively, at how x86 continues to close the gap, you realize that the day is coming when mainframes will go away or be otherwise not distinguishable.
Look: when the 486 came out circa 1989, its memory bandwidth to RAM was about 70MB/second. That was the speed of a single disk channel for an IBM mainframe, a huge difference in performance specs.
Interconnects? NUMA? Heck the 486 wasn't even good for 2-way SMP - while the mainframe could be hooked up into a clustered sysplex (1994, or the earlier virtual coupling facility) and even mirrored over long distance links (GDPS).
Look at the way these differences have been minimized in recent times ... the mainframe chip borrows its GX IO chip from POWER, fer cryin' out loud...
- rbanffy 16y agoYour logic is flawed. The impressiveness of current and near-future x86 processors (and they are, considering they are still compatible with 8088's, quite impressive) has no relation to how impressive the x196 and its support chips are. To use my previous analogy, the X-15 or the SR-71 are impressive machines, but that doesn't make a 8,000 TEU freighter, or an aircraft carrier, less impressive. The differences in basic technology are being reduced, but all it does is to make the current crop of x86s look less crippled compared to POWER and zCPUs. And, mind you, POWER makes a top-of-the-line x86 look like a toy.