5 ms·
Heh, this story is always interesting when it comes up. The Harper's article is well-written, too. It just boggles the mind that this kid actually made a fricki
by leggomylibro 9y ago
Heh, this story is always interesting when it comes up. The Harper's article is well-written, too. It just boggles the mind that this kid actually made a frickin' unshielded nuclear reactor core. He actually did it, the absolute madman.
I like how the police brought him in as a kid for having a nuclear device, he made a superfund site out of the whole deal, and he still grew up to work aboard a nuclear aircraft carrier. The Navy must have known, right? I wonder what those conversations must have been like.
Also, I am super not surprised that Wikipedia says, "He was inspired in part by reading The Golden Book of Chemistry Experiments." That book is just goatshit insane; the '60s were clearly a silly time, because the 'also by this author' section includes The Golden Book of Wild Animal Pets. Which, uh...I don't know. I got nothing.
Anyways, it's public domain, but before you hand it to a young child be warned that it includes phrases like, "making Hydrogen in the lab," and "have a bottle of household ammonia to sniff if you get too strong a whiff of Chlorine." Yikes.
https://archive.org/details/GoldenBookOfChemistryExperiments https://archive.org/details/GoldenBookOfChemistryExperiments
- a_t48 9y agoComeon, making Hydrogen isn't that crazy, you just hook up a 9V battery to a glass of water. Edit: skimmed the book. They first make Hydrogen through electrolysis (cool!). Then they make it from hydro-chloric acid (cool! also dangerous!).
- leggomylibro 9y agoYeah, but most books don't go into detail for separating the resulting hydrogen and oxygen, testing for hydrogen by burning it, or observing the difference in using hydrogen and oxygen to burn things. Sure, it's easy to observe, but be careful... I do really like the book's can-do attitude, though.
- a_t48 9y agoYeah, especially as it says your lab can be in your bedroom or basement. Generating larger amounts of flammable gas indoors and burning it is less sane.
- scoggs 9y agoHopefully nobody at home is an active smoker, either!
- wavefunction 9y agoAs long as you have proper ventilation what's the real issue? Yes, I may have investigated installing a chemical hood in my house, but it was all theoretical... for now.
- leggomylibro 9y agoSheets of acrylic can make great housings for things like this; they're transparent, and a plastics shop will cut you panels to size for cheap. One example of an instrument you can make with acrylics is a gel electrophoresis box: http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/labs/gel/build_gel_box.pdf http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/labs/gel/build_gel_bo... Some chemicals can dissolve plastics, but hey. It's cheap, sturdy, and easy to assemble. Acrylic cement has the consistency of turpentine and sets pretty quickly.
- WillReplyfFood 9y agoHey, lost some seared tissue, rhymes with whats the real issue.
- moonbug22 9y agoReally? That's high school chemistry in this part of the world
- leggomylibro 9y agoThat's awesome - and it really isn't so dangerous as long as you are careful and do your experiments around others who also know what they're doing. I actually love the sense of 'you can do anything' that this sort of education inspires. But, y'know, it's not the sort of thing I'd hand a 14-year-old before heading off for the weekend. And imagining what would happen if you brought this to your chemistry class today in the US is pretty amusing.
- Symbiote 9y agoWhat's a typical high school chemistry experiment in the USA? Do the students do things, or does the teacher do everything? Burning hydrogen was a standard method for testing its presence, from when I was about 11-12 in 1997.
- whatshisface 9y agoMeasuring the volume of one liter of water. But, more seriously, it depends almost entirely on the highschool itself. I know of a range going from essentially no lab work to undergrad material with looser report grading - and I imagine that top flight magnet schools must have all sorts of amazing equipment.
- rjeli 9y agoMy high school chemistry was a year of learning the names of glassware and many experiments of just measuring water. We did one titration at the end. once, we got to watch the teacher go into the back room and get two chemicals, mixing them together and we watched it change colors. then back to usual. Didn’t even learn dimensional analysis til undergrad.
- eat_veggies 9y agoI took chemistry in high school last year, so I can answer this. Some of our most exciting labs were - identifying different metal oxides by the color of their flames over a bunsen burner - paper chromatography to identify a the "crime suspect" who wrote a "ransom note" based on different pens - made brass pennies with zinc dust, copper pennies, and a hot plate - made our own chalk We did all the labs on our own except for the brass pennies, because it was way more efficient to stir the pennies up all at once in the zinc powder than individually. I really enjoyed that class, but I do go to a school that prides itself in math and science, and our football team loses every time :)
- burntrelish1273 9y agoAs a kid, I had this vintage science experiments book[0] that had that and helicopter-parent-forbidden chemistry experiments (ahh, the era before abuse of torts). Inverted test-tube semi-submerged, filled completely with water, over each electrode to see progress IIRC. 700 Science Experiments for Everyone 1958, UNESCO, Hardcover, 221 pp.
- zamalek 9y agoKnowledge that ammonia can counteract chlorine is quite useful. I'm not sure if I would do an experiment involving lethal amounts of chlorine but that knowledge statistically increases lifespan. "Fire Burns and hurts" is an early lesson for many people, in a vaguely similar way, reading a crazy book like that is a shortcut past the more life-ending lessons.