2 ms·
> But it makes no sense to single people out only if there was an accident. A driver could reasonably argue that one distraction or another didn't significantl
by Zak 9y ago
> But it makes no sense to single people out only if there was an accident.
A driver could reasonably argue that one distraction or another didn't significantly impair their ability to drive, but when it results in an accident, that question is answered.
I do, however believe that distracted driving should result in something more than a $50 fine.
- rhino369 9y agoBut that's a bad argument, which is often used by drunk drivers to justify their behavior. "I'm fine, i've never gotten into an accident." And they do.
- Zak 9y agoThe legal system draws a distinction: DUI-homicide is classified as second degree murder in many states, while DUI by itself itself is a misdemeanor. Of course, this is a bad measure of the level of recklessness, but the legal system has taken the degree of bad result into account along with the degree of bad intent. Murder is worse than attempted murder, etc....