>You're completely undermining the concept of deterrence. You're imposing a .002% chance of dying on someone else, you incur a .002% chance of jail. A .002% ch

>You're completely undermining the concept of deterrence. You're imposing a .002% chance of dying on someone else, you incur a .002% chance of jail. A .002% chance of jail is not an effective deterrence because people are shit at calculating low risks like that. We should treat it like we do drunk drivers. You get caught on your phone, you face serious penalties even if nobody is hurt.