4 ms·
> I think the real problem is that there's no real established pattern for authentication (the way there is for things like signing up for a web app). No. The
by dozzie 9y ago
> I think the real problem is that there's no real established pattern for authentication (the way there is for things like signing up for a web app).
No. The real problem is that a device you bought requires internet access for
no good reason, spies on you ("collects information") with no good reason, and
becomes useless garbage once the company that sells it goes out of business or
decides to terminate the product line or just grows to dislike you, all that
for your lightbulb in the toilet to dim to the beat of played music.
For IoT to be useful at all, the devices would need substantial configuration
possibilities, like where and with what protocol send data to, or better yet,
whom to allow to fetch data from the device. But this would be only for
hobbysts, as general public is not interested in tinkering.
- jkestner 9y agoI agree with you, from the nerd perspective. The general public cares more about utility than privacy, unfortunately, but the equation is similar in both cases: are we getting more value than we’re giving up in control? Much as HyperCard, Excel, etc have allowed non-nerds to solve their own problems or scratch an itch, there is room in IoT for these people to tinker. They just need the right tools and framing.