5 ms·
undoubtedly that person was talking about LINQ and not var usage
by ambulancechaser 9y ago
undoubtedly that person was talking about LINQ and not var usage
- JustSomeNobody 9y agoYes, LINQ not var.
- btschaegg 9y agoWell, that on the other hand does indeed make sense, depending on the context. The only question there could be if it's a good idea to use a garbage collected language to directly[1] interact with hardware. [1]: Well, at least directly enough for LINQ performance to be a problem.
- JustSomeNobody 9y agoWe're not real time, but we do have some time constraints. Yes, all this was kicked around and argued about.
- dbattaglia 9y agoOr possibly confusing "var" and "dynamic"?
- tigershark 9y agoUndoubtedly he didn't read properly then. The banned feature was var, linq was just heavily frowned upon.