3 ms·
In this case there are plenty of sources saying the same thing so it does not make sense to shoot the messenger. https://www.startpage.com/do/search?q=corbyn+m
by Yetanfou 9y ago
In this case there are plenty of sources saying the same thing so it does not make sense to shoot the messenger.
https://www.startpage.com/do/search?q=corbyn+marxism https://www.startpage.com/do/search?q=corbyn+marxism
- maxehmookau 9y agoA web search doesn't count as research. No reputable journalist in the UK genuinely believes that Corbyn is a marxist. It's lazy 'googling' about 'facts' that landed America with Trump.
- Yetanfou 9y agoA web search is not meant to count as research, it is the equivalent of a library catalogue search. You're meant to follow the links and find out what is written on the subject. It is the internet equivalent of a literature study and as such a form or research. The assumption here is that the reader is intelligent enough to be able to separate authoritative sources from hearsay and agenda-based publications. By the way, using terms like "no reputable journalist" is called "Master suppression technique" or "domination technique" [1]. It is detrimental to having a fact-based discussion and generally seen as a cop-out for those who don't have real arguments to add to the discussion. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_suppression_technique https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_suppression_technique