3 ms·
One way is to ask questions. The first way that most of us think to confront someone is to make statements: "You're wrong." Even impersonal facts, like "Solar
by combatentropy 9y ago
One way is to ask questions.
The first way that most of us think to confront someone is to make statements: "You're wrong." Even impersonal facts, like "Solar is now cheaper per watt than coal" is unlikely to persuade your opponent, partially because they can tune you out as you ramble on.
But if you ask a question, they have to listen closely, to avoid looking foolish when it's their turn to talk. A direct question is also more likely to lead them to think. Furthermore, a question is more polite.
A question can still be devastating, "If you think x is better than y, then how do you account for (insert hard fact here)."
- kevintb 9y agoInteresting - like the Socratic method.
- rootlocus 9y ago> A question can still be devastating, "If you think x is better than y, then how do you account for (insert hard fact here)." I've met people who can't be devastated by anything. They always have an answer, and it's always someone else's fault. They can invent "hard facts" out of thin air or dismiss real facts just as easily. They're actually really easy to find. One such person is president now.