3 ms·
This sounds almost too good to be true. It's published in a lower impact journal so I'm wondering if the sample size was very small. Also, how did they confirm
by jdpigeon 9y ago
This sounds almost too good to be true. It's published in a lower impact journal so I'm wondering if the sample size was very small. Also, how did they confirm the 'topography of the pathophysiology' (where the disease is) without taking people's scalps off?
- w458cmau 9y agoLooks like n=20 from skimming. MEG and MRI scans were used. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.23724/epdf http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.23724/epdf
- joelthelion 9y agoYep. Far too early to get excited.