Articles on wikipedia should not be watered down for the common masses, especially if those articles require equations/mathematics that underpins them. In the f

Articles on wikipedia should not be watered down for the common masses, especially if those articles require equations/mathematics that underpins them. In the following quote "In making the general point that science uses its intrinsic difficulty as a mechanism for enforcing an otherwise artificial exclusivity" the author doesn't want to accept the fact that, if every science article on wikipedia or for that matter on any website is written for novices, then it would needlessly become lengthy. Also for many such articles the reference links would point to the articles for gaining a more fundamental understanding of the subject.