2 ms·
I disagree that it's thriving! It's a pretty weird combination of a JavaScript-like interpreter with non-JavaScript stdlib and bizarre choice of keywords, for e
by nikolay 9y ago
I disagree that it's thriving! It's a pretty weird combination of a JavaScript-like interpreter with non-JavaScript stdlib and bizarre choice of keywords, for example, 'local' and not 'var'/'let,' etc. It's capabilities as a language are pretty limited, so, although at first sight, it looks great, it's pretty limited, and even Jinja2 gives you more, so, you see more and more people combining Jinja2 with Jsonnet, which is proof that it's doomed.