8 ms·
The iPhone was not built with venture money. Your comparison does not hold at all.
by rburhum 9y ago
The iPhone was not built with venture money. Your comparison does not hold at all.
- new299 9y agoWhile I agree the situation was very different, arguably the iPhone was built with venture money. NeXT did receive venture funding (which obviously became the core os MacOS and iOS). Fingerworks, was also a key acquisition. I can't find any information about the funding Fingerworks received, but being a university spin out it seems likely that they received at least seed funding.
- othersideofcoin 9y agoFrom a risk perspective, incorrect. Its only from the hindsight, where the iPhone development could be perceived as linear, that this is correct. Fingerworks, and any others, were acquired after risk factors went down. Never forget your own hindsight bias, where the pdf collapses to 1.
- rburhum 9y agoOh geez, if you want to play the linear game, you can even trace the Android development to the Roman empire. To put the conversation back in a grounded and reasonable list of arguments, let's start with the premise that technology != business. So even if the tech that Magic Leap is creating is so great, by the time they go to market, they will be competing with an ecosystem already in place. Apple will have all the apps that have been built with their ARKit (not to mention their App Store monetization strategy). Sony, FB/Oculus, HTC and MS are already at the infancy of developing something serious there. If Magic Leap came out with a product today, they are already starting behind. If we take in consideration price point, it even becomes a more challenging scenario.