I'm going to ignore the utterly-intolerant and ignorant last paragraph of your comment, but weigh in on the starting part of your comment. You seem to assert t

I'm going to ignore the utterly-intolerant and ignorant last paragraph of your comment, but weigh in on the starting part of your comment. You seem to assert that those two statements: a.) "research about GLBTQ populations asserts ... orientation is ... a state of being" and b.) "[Keeton] will not affirm the morality of those behaviors" are contradictory. Are they? Does psychological research dictate morality? That seems to be what you're saying. What about other behaviors society more consistently deems as immoral, like drunkenness? If some day the "psychological research about alcoholic populations asserts that that propensity to drink in excess is not a lifestyle or choice, but a state of being", would that suddenly make drunkenness moral? Do you truly believe morality comes from the dictates of psychological research?