Applying the same logic of "if X is found in population Z, therefore culture of population Z" for say some objectively negative status such as health effects, m

Applying the same logic of "if X is found in population Z, therefore culture of population Z" for say some objectively negative status such as health effects, mortality, etc, should be "disrespectful" as you say I would hope. "More diabetes? That's their culture" comes off a bit harsh right? Your comment makes me think about the origins of the phrase "blaming the victim" surrounding the Moyniham report.